Authorizing modification of resources

ABSTRACT

A method for execution by a computing device includes determining a set of actor parties required to authorize a change of protection status of a stored resource from a protected status to an unprotected status. A minimum quorum is determined for each of the set of actor parties. A plurality of authorizations to change the protection status of the resource to the unprotected status are received from a plurality of requestors via the network. A plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors corresponding to the set of actor parties are identified. The protection status of the resource is set to the unprotected status in response to determining, for every one of the set of actor parties, that a number of requestors in a corresponding one of the plurality of subsets is greater than or equal to the minimum quorum for the one of the set of actor parties.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

Not applicable.

INCORPORATION-BY-REFERENCE OF MATERIAL SUBMITTED ON A COMPACT DISC

Not applicable.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Technical Field of the Invention

This invention relates generally to computer networks and moreparticularly to dispersing error encoded data.

Description of Related Art

Computing devices are known to communicate data, process data, and/orstore data. Such computing devices range from wireless smart phones,laptops, tablets, personal computers (PC), work stations, and video gamedevices, to data centers that support millions of web searches, stocktrades, or on-line purchases every day. In general, a computing deviceincludes a central processing unit (CPU), a memory system, userinput/output interfaces, peripheral device interfaces, and aninterconnecting bus structure.

As is further known, a computer may effectively extend its CPU by using“cloud computing” to perform one or more computing functions (e.g., aservice, an application, an algorithm, an arithmetic logic function,etc.) on behalf of the computer. Further, for large services,applications, and/or functions, cloud computing may be performed bymultiple cloud computing resources in a distributed manner to improvethe response time for completion of the service, application, and/orfunction. For example, Hadoop is an open source software framework thatsupports distributed applications enabling application execution bythousands of computers.

In addition to cloud computing, a computer may use “cloud storage” aspart of its memory system. As is known, cloud storage enables a user,via its computer, to store files, applications, etc. on an Internetstorage system. The Internet storage system may include a RAID(redundant array of independent disks) system and/or a dispersed storagesystem that uses an error correction scheme to encode data for storage.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWING(S)

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a dispersed ordistributed storage network (DSN) in accordance with the presentinvention;

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a computing corein accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storageerror encoding of data in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of a generic example of an errorencoding function in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a specific example of an errorencoding function in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a schematic block diagram of an example of a slice name of anencoded data slice (EDS) in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storageerror decoding of data in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 8 is a schematic block diagram of a generic example of an errordecoding function in accordance with the present invention;

FIGS. 9A-9C are schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a dispersedor distributed storage network (DSN) in accordance with the presentinvention; and

FIG. 10 is a logic diagram of an example of a method of authorizingmodification of resources in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 11 depicts a cloud computing environment according to an embodimentof the present invention;

FIG. 12 depicts abstraction model layers according to an embodiment ofthe present invention; and

FIG. 13 depicts a block diagram of a computing device according tovarious embodiments of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a dispersed, ordistributed, storage network (DSN) 10 that includes a plurality ofcomputing devices 12-16, a managing unit 18, an integrity processingunit 20, and a DSN memory 22. The components of the DSN 10 are coupledto a network 24, which may include one or more wireless and/or wirelined communication systems; one or more non-public intranet systemsand/or public internet systems; one or more satellite communicationsystems; one or more fiber optic communication systems; and/or one ormore local area networks (LAN) and/or wide area networks (WAN).

The DSN memory 22 includes a plurality of storage units 36 that may belocated at geographically different sites (e.g., one in Chicago, one inMilwaukee, etc.), at a common site, or a combination thereof. Forexample, if the DSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, eachstorage unit is located at a different site. As another example, if theDSN memory 22 includes eight storage units 36, all eight storage unitsare located at the same site. As yet another example, if the DSN memory22 includes eight storage units 36, a first pair of storage units are ata first common site, a second pair of storage units are at a secondcommon site, a third pair of storage units are at a third common site,and a fourth pair of storage units are at a fourth common site. Notethat a DSN memory 22 may include more or less than eight storage units36. Further note that each storage unit 36 includes a computing core (asshown in FIG. 2, or components thereof) and a plurality of memorydevices for storing dispersed error encoded data.

In various embodiments, each of the storage units operates as adistributed storage and task (DST) execution unit, and is operable tostore dispersed error encoded data and/or to execute, in a distributedmanner, one or more tasks on data. The tasks may be a simple function(e.g., a mathematical function, a logic function, an identify function,a find function, a search engine function, a replace function, etc.), acomplex function (e.g., compression, human and/or computer languagetranslation, text-to-voice conversion, voice-to-text conversion, etc.),multiple simple and/or complex functions, one or more algorithms, one ormore applications, etc. Hereafter, a storage unit may be interchangeablyreferred to as a dispersed storage and task (DST) execution unit and aset of storage units may be interchangeably referred to as a set of DSTexecution units.

Each of the computing devices 12-16, the managing unit 18, and theintegrity processing unit 20 include a computing core 26, which includesnetwork interfaces 30-33. Computing devices 12-16 may each be a portablecomputing device and/or a fixed computing device. A portable computingdevice may be a social networking device, a gaming device, a cell phone,a smart phone, a digital assistant, a digital music player, a digitalvideo player, a laptop computer, a handheld computer, a tablet, a videogame controller, and/or any other portable device that includes acomputing core. A fixed computing device may be a computer (PC), acomputer server, a cable set-top box, a satellite receiver, a televisionset, a printer, a fax machine, home entertainment equipment, a videogame console, and/or any type of home or office computing equipment.Note that each managing unit 18 and the integrity processing unit 20 maybe separate computing devices, may be a common computing device, and/ormay be integrated into one or more of the computing devices 12-16 and/orinto one or more of the storage units 36. In various embodiments,computing devices 12-16 can include user devices and/or can be utilizedby a requesting entity generating access requests, which can includerequests to read or write data to storage units in the DSN.

Each interface 30, 32, and 33 includes software and hardware to supportone or more communication links via the network 24 indirectly and/ordirectly. For example, interface 30 supports a communication link (e.g.,wired, wireless, direct, via a LAN, via the network 24, etc.) betweencomputing devices 14 and 16. As another example, interface 32 supportscommunication links (e.g., a wired connection, a wireless connection, aLAN connection, and/or any other type of connection to/from the network24) between computing devices 12 & 16 and the DSN memory 22. As yetanother example, interface 33 supports a communication link for each ofthe managing unit 18 and the integrity processing unit 20 to the network24.

Computing devices 12 and 16 include a dispersed storage (DS) clientmodule 34, which enables the computing device to dispersed storage errorencode and decode data as subsequently described with reference to oneor more of FIGS. 3-8. In this example embodiment, computing device 16functions as a dispersed storage processing agent for computing device14. In this role, computing device 16 dispersed storage error encodesand decodes data on behalf of computing device 14. With the use ofdispersed storage error encoding and decoding, the DSN 10 is tolerant ofa significant number of storage unit failures (the number of failures isbased on parameters of the dispersed storage error encoding function)without loss of data and without the need for a redundant or backupcopies of the data. Further, the DSN 10 stores data for an indefiniteperiod of time without data loss and in a secure manner (e.g., thesystem is very resistant to unauthorized attempts at accessing thedata).

In operation, the managing unit 18 performs DS management services. Forexample, the managing unit 18 establishes distributed data storageparameters (e.g., vault creation, distributed storage parameters,security parameters, billing information, user profile information,etc.) for computing devices 12-14 individually or as part of a group ofuser devices. As a specific example, the managing unit 18 coordinatescreation of a vault (e.g., a virtual memory block associated with aportion of an overall namespace of the DSN) within the DSN memory 22 fora user device, a group of devices, or for public access and establishesper vault dispersed storage (DS) error encoding parameters for a vault.The managing unit 18 facilitates storage of DS error encoding parametersfor each vault by updating registry information of the DSN 10, where theregistry information may be stored in the DSN memory 22, a computingdevice 12-16, the managing unit 18, and/or the integrity processing unit20.

The DSN managing unit 18 creates and stores user profile information(e.g., an access control list (ACL)) in local memory and/or withinmemory of the DSN memory 22. The user profile information includesauthentication information, permissions, and/or the security parameters.The security parameters may include encryption/decryption scheme, one ormore encryption keys, key generation scheme, and/or dataencoding/decoding scheme.

The DSN managing unit 18 creates billing information for a particularuser, a user group, a vault access, public vault access, etc. Forinstance, the DSN managing unit 18 tracks the number of times a useraccesses a non-public vault and/or public vaults, which can be used togenerate a per-access billing information. In another instance, the DSNmanaging unit 18 tracks the amount of data stored and/or retrieved by auser device and/or a user group, which can be used to generate aper-data-amount billing information.

As another example, the managing unit 18 performs network operations,network administration, and/or network maintenance. Network operationsincludes authenticating user data allocation requests (e.g., read and/orwrite requests), managing creation of vaults, establishingauthentication credentials for user devices, adding/deleting components(e.g., user devices, storage units, and/or computing devices with a DSclient module 34) to/from the DSN 10, and/or establishing authenticationcredentials for the storage units 36. Network administration includesmonitoring devices and/or units for failures, maintaining vaultinformation, determining device and/or unit activation status,determining device and/or unit loading, and/or determining any othersystem level operation that affects the performance level of the DSN 10.Network maintenance includes facilitating replacing, upgrading,repairing, and/or expanding a device and/or unit of the DSN 10.

The integrity processing unit 20 performs rebuilding of ‘bad’ or missingencoded data slices. At a high level, the integrity processing unit 20performs rebuilding by periodically attempting to retrieve/list encodeddata slices, and/or slice names of the encoded data slices, from the DSNmemory 22. For retrieved encoded slices, they are checked for errors dueto data corruption, outdated version, etc. If a slice includes an error,it is flagged as a ‘bad’ slice. For encoded data slices that were notreceived and/or not listed, they are flagged as missing slices. Badand/or missing slices are subsequently rebuilt using other retrievedencoded data slices that are deemed to be good slices to produce rebuiltslices. The rebuilt slices are stored in the DSN memory 22.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of an embodiment of a computing core26 that includes a processing module 50, a memory controller 52, mainmemory 54, a video graphics processing unit 55, an input/output (IO)controller 56, a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) interface 58,an 10 interface module 60, at least one IO device interface module 62, aread only memory (ROM) basic input output system (BIOS) 64, and one ormore memory interface modules. The one or more memory interfacemodule(s) includes one or more of a universal serial bus (USB) interfacemodule 66, a host bus adapter (HBA) interface module 68, a networkinterface module 70, a flash interface module 72, a hard drive interfacemodule 74, and a DSN interface module 76.

The DSN interface module 76 functions to mimic a conventional operatingsystem (OS) file system interface (e.g., network file system (NFS),flash file system (FFS), disk file system (DFS), file transfer protocol(FTP), web-based distributed authoring and versioning (WebDAV), etc.)and/or a block memory interface (e.g., small computer system interface(SCSI), internet small computer system interface (iSCSI), etc.). The DSNinterface module 76 and/or the network interface module 70 may functionas one or more of the interface 30-33 of FIG. 1. Note that the IO deviceinterface module 62 and/or the memory interface modules 66-76 may becollectively or individually referred to as IO ports.

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storageerror encoding of data. When a computing device 12 or 16 has data tostore it disperse storage error encodes the data in accordance with adispersed storage error encoding process based on dispersed storageerror encoding parameters. Here, the computing device stores data object40, which can include a file (e.g., text, video, audio, etc.), or otherdata arrangement. The dispersed storage error encoding parametersinclude an encoding function (e.g., information dispersal algorithm(IDA), Reed-Solomon, Cauchy Reed-Solomon, systematic encoding,non-systematic encoding, on-line codes, etc.), a data segmentingprotocol (e.g., data segment size, fixed, variable, etc.), and per datasegment encoding values. The per data segment encoding values include atotal, or pillar width, number (T) of encoded data slices per encodingof a data segment i.e., in a set of encoded data slices); a decodethreshold number (D) of encoded data slices of a set of encoded dataslices that are needed to recover the data segment; a read thresholdnumber (R) of encoded data slices to indicate a number of encoded dataslices per set to be read from storage for decoding of the data segment;and/or a write threshold number (W) to indicate a number of encoded dataslices per set that must be accurately stored before the encoded datasegment is deemed to have been properly stored. The dispersed storageerror encoding parameters may further include slicing information (e.g.,the number of encoded data slices that will be created for each datasegment) and/or slice security information (e.g., per encoded data sliceencryption, compression, integrity checksum, etc.). As used herein, thedispersed storage error encoding parameters can be interchangeablyreferred to as IDA parameters, and T can be interchangeable referred toan IDA width threshold of a dispersed storage error encoding function.

In the present example, Cauchy Reed-Solomon has been selected as theencoding function (a generic example is shown in FIG. 4 and a specificexample is shown in FIG. 5); the data segmenting protocol is to dividethe data object into fixed sized data segments; and the per data segmentencoding values include: a pillar width of 5, a decode threshold of 3, aread threshold of 4, and a write threshold of 4. In accordance with thedata segmenting protocol, the computing device 12 or 16 divides dataobject 40 into a plurality of fixed sized data segments (e.g., 1 throughY of a fixed size in range of Kilo-bytes to Tera-bytes or more). Thenumber of data segments created is dependent of the size of the data andthe data segmenting protocol.

The computing device 12 or 16 then disperse storage error encodes a datasegment using the selected encoding function (e.g., Cauchy Reed-Solomon)to produce a set of encoded data slices. FIG. 4 illustrates a genericCauchy Reed-Solomon encoding function, which includes an encoding matrix(EM), a data matrix (DM), and a coded matrix (CM). The size of theencoding matrix (EM) is dependent on the pillar width number (T) and thedecode threshold number (D) of selected per data segment encodingvalues. To produce the data matrix (DM), the data segment is dividedinto a plurality of data blocks and the data blocks are arranged into Dnumber of rows with Z data blocks per row. Note that Z is a function ofthe number of data blocks created from the data segment and the decodethreshold number (D). The coded matrix is produced by matrix multiplyingthe data matrix by the encoding matrix.

FIG. 5 illustrates a specific example of Cauchy Reed-Solomon encodingwith a pillar number (T) of five and decode threshold number of three.In this example, a first data segment is divided into twelve data blocks(D1-D12). The coded matrix includes five rows of coded data blocks,where the first row of X11-X14 corresponds to a first encoded data slice(EDS 1_1), the second row of X21-X24 corresponds to a second encodeddata slice (EDS 2_1), the third row of X31-X34 corresponds to a thirdencoded data slice (EDS 3_1), the fourth row of X41-X44 corresponds to afourth encoded data slice (EDS 4_1), and the fifth row of X51-X54corresponds to a fifth encoded data slice (EDS 5_1). Note that thesecond number of the EDS designation corresponds to the data segmentnumber.

Returning to the discussion of FIG. 3, the computing device also createsa slice name (SN) for each encoded data slice (EDS) in the set ofencoded data slices. A typical format for a slice name 80 is shown inFIG. 6. As shown, the slice name (SN) 80 includes a pillar number of theencoded data slice (e.g., one of 1-T), a data segment number (e.g., oneof 1-Y), a vault identifier (ID), a data object identifier (ID), and mayfurther include revision level information of the encoded data slices.The slice name functions as, at least part of, a DSN address for theencoded data slice for storage and retrieval from the DSN memory 22.

As a result of encoding, the computing device 12 or 16 produces aplurality of sets of encoded data slices, which are provided with theirrespective slice names to the storage units for storage. As shown, thefirst set of encoded data slices includes EDS 1_1 through EDS 5_1 andthe first set of slice names includes SN 1_1 through SN 5_1 and the lastset of encoded data slices includes EDS 1_Y through EDS 5_Y and the lastset of slice names includes SN 1_Y through SN 5_Y.

FIG. 7 is a schematic block diagram of an example of dispersed storageerror decoding of a data object that was dispersed storage error encodedand stored in the example of FIG. 4. In this example, the computingdevice 12 or 16 retrieves from the storage units at least the decodethreshold number of encoded data slices per data segment. As a specificexample, the computing device retrieves a read threshold number ofencoded data slices.

To recover a data segment from a decode threshold number of encoded dataslices, the computing device uses a decoding function as shown in FIG.8. As shown, the decoding function is essentially an inverse of theencoding function of FIG. 4. The coded matrix includes a decodethreshold number of rows (e.g., three in this example) and the decodingmatrix in an inversion of the encoding matrix that includes thecorresponding rows of the coded matrix. For example, if the coded matrixincludes rows 1, 2, and 4, the encoding matrix is reduced to rows 1, 2,and 4, and then inverted to produce the decoding matrix.

FIGS. 9A-9C illustrate schematic block diagrams of another embodiment ofa dispersed storage network (DSN) that includes a computing device 916and the network 24 of FIG. 1. The computing device 916 can include theinterface 32 of FIG. 1, the computing core 26 of FIG. 1, and/or the DSclient module 34 of FIG. 1. The computing device 916 can be implementedby utilizing a computing device 12-16 of FIG. 1. For example, thecomputing device 916 can be implemented as a dispersed storageprocessing agent for computing device 14 as described previously, and/orcan be implemented as a dispersed storage and task (DST) processing unitof the DSN. The DSN functions to authorize modification of data storedin the DSN.

As illustrated in FIG. 9A, the computing device 916 can communicate withat least one client device 955, which can include a processor and memoryenabling the client device to display a graphical user interface (GUI)965 via a display device 957, enabling the client device to receive, viathe network, prompts or other application data for display via the GUI965, and/or enabling the client device to generate data based on userinput responding to prompts displayed via GUI 965, for transmission vianetwork 24. For example, client device 955 can be implemented byutilizing the computing device 12, 14, and/or 16 of FIG. 1 and/or caninclude a computing core 26 of FIG. 2.

As illustrated in FIG. 9B, the computing device 916 can communicate witha plurality of requestors 1-N. Each requestor 1-N can include aprocessor and memory enabling the requestor to generate authorizationsfor transmission via network 24, for example, based on user input to aGUI displayed by a display device of each requestor 1-N. For example,some or all requestors 1-N can be implemented by utilizing the computingdevice 12, 14, and/or 16 of FIG. 1 and/or can include a computing core26 of FIG. 2. One or more of the requestors 1-N can correspond to the atleast one client device 955 of FIG. 1.

As illustrated in FIG. 9C, the computing device 916 can communicate witha plurality of storage units 936 via network 24. The plurality ofstorage units 936 can correspond to some or all of a set of storageunits 36 of a DSN memory 22.

The DSN can be operable to store resources in memory. A resource caninclude a data object and/or one or more data segments of a data object,for example, as one or more encoded data slices stored in an IDA widththreshold number of the plurality of storage units 936. Alternatively orin addition, a resource can correspond to a single encoded data slicestored by a storage unit 936. Alternatively or in addition, a resourcecan correspond any data stored in one or more storage units 936 of theDSN. Some or all resources can be assigned a protection status, whichcan correspond to a protected status, or an unprotected status. Aresource with a protected status has the property that it can be readbut cannot be modified and/or deleted, until the protection status ofthe resource changes from protected to unprotected. In some embodiments,a resource is automatically assigned the status of protected from thetime it is written to memory, and the protected status of the resourceis maintained until a corresponding protection period has elapsed.

For example, the computing device 916 can receive a resource to bewritten to memory, for example, from one of the requestors via thenetwork. The computing device can write the resource to memory bydispersed storage error encoding one or more data segments of theresource into a plurality of encoded data slices, and can transmit theplurality of encoded data slices to a corresponding IDA width thresholdnumber of storage units 936. The computing device can maintainprotection status information for the resources it manages, for example,in local memory by utilizing a memory module 954, which can beimplemented by utilizing the main memory 54 of FIG. 2 or any othermemory. Alternatively, the protection status of the resources stored inmemory can be stored by a different entity, and the computing device canretrieve and/or alter the protection status of some or all of theresources it manages via network 24. In particular, in response towriting a resource to memory, the computing device can set the status ofthe resource as protected, and can change the status of the resource tounprotected in response to determining that the protection period haselapsed. This property of protecting a resource for a protection periodcan be applied for use cases related to security, regulatory complianceetc.

However, there may be certain scenarios where an exception is required.The DSN can function to provide a mechanism to unprotect a protectedresource, even before the protection period has elapsed. Regulatoryrequirements can dictate that the exception mechanism built into thesystem be designed to prevent a malicious actor from abusing it andunprotecting resources. Explicit business and regulatory clearance canbe required to grant a DSN operator and/or administrator theauthorization to unprotect a protected resource. In addition, an enduser of the DSN memory also need to be assured that their protectedresources cannot be unprotected without their explicit authorization.

A computing device 916, or other entity of the DSN, can achieve this byutilizing an M of N access control approach. In this approach, thesystem can be configured with a minimum quorum required to execute anunprotect operation and/or to otherwise change the status from protectedto unprotected, for example, in conjunction with a request to modifyand/or delete the resource. This unprotect operation is successfullycompleted if and only if the minimum quorum authorizations have beenreceived. As long as the number of authorizations received is below therequired quorum, the resource remains protected. This approachguarantees that a single malicious user cannot unprotect the resource.However, this approach alone provides no assurance that all relevantparties have participated in the authorization.

The computing device 916, or other entity of the DSN, can furtherensures that all relevant parties have participated to authorize theunprotect operation. To achieve this, minimum quorum is quantified peractor party (relevant party). In order to achieve a quorum forperforming the unprotect operation, all actor parties need toparticipate. An actor party can be an individual. Alternatively, anactor party can be a group of individuals, where any member from thatgroup can help achieve the minimum quorum required for that actor party.

Any number of actor parties can be defined for a resource, where eachactor party can have any number of possible individuals or otherrequesting entities, and where each actor party can have any minimumquorum that is at least one and is less than or equal to the totalnumber of possible requesting entities in the actor party. For example,as illustrated in FIG. 9A, a computing device 916 can store quorum datafor each of a plurality of resources 1-R managed by the computing deviceand/or stored by the computing device. The quorum data for some or allof the plurality of resources 1-R can be the same or different.

In the example illustrated in FIG. 9A, resource 1 has quorum dataindicating actor parties 1-P. Actor party 1 of resource 1 includes Jpossible requestors 1.1-1.J. The minimum quorum for actor party 1 ofresource 1 is equal to three, but can be alternatively equal to anynumber that is greater than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to J.Actor party P of resource 1 includes K possible requestors P.1-P.K, andhas a minimum quorum of one. The possible requesting entities betweendifferent actor parties can be mutually exclusive, where no two actorparties include a same requestor. Alternatively, a same requestor can beincluded in multiple actor parties, but may not be allowed to be countedtowards minimum quorums for more than one actor party.

The actor parties can correspond to different roles of variousrequestors and/or individuals in the system. For example, the system canbe configured such that the minimum quorum requires at least oneauthorization from an end user (owner) of the resource, and at leastonce authorization from a single operator of the system, such as anoperator and/or administrator of the DSN. One actor party can correspondto an operator party that includes the single operator, and the minimumquorum can be satisfied for the operator party when the single operatorprovides authorization. Another actor party can correspond to the ownerparty, where any one of a plurality of end users can provideauthorization to satisfy the minimum quorum for the owner party.Alternatively the minimum quorum can be greater than one for the ownerparty, as it includes a plurality of end users, and this minimum numberof end users must provide authorization to satisfy the minimum quorumfor the owner party.

In some embodiments, the plurality of possible requestors for an actorparty can be enumerated in the quorum data by identifiers of clientdevices and/or identifiers of the corresponding individuals.Alternatively, the plurality of possible requestors for an actor partycan be identified based on a set of criteria that must be met for aparticular requestor to fall within the actor party. In theseembodiments, the number of actors in a particular actor party may beunknown.

The quorum data for some or all resources can be determined by anadministrator of the DSN, an owner of the resource, a requestor thatoriginally sent the resource to the computing device 916 for storage inthe DSN, and/or by another entity via interaction with GUI 965 displayedby a display device 957 of a client device 955 associated with theadministrator, owner of the resource, or other entity. For example,application data and/or one or more prompts can be sent to the clientdevice 955 for display to the user via GUI 965, enabling GUI 965 todisplay at least one prompt for the user to provide minimum quorumselection data. The user can interact with GUI 965 to provide user inputindicating minimum quorum selection data. The minimum quorum selectiondata can include some or all of the quorum data for one or more of theresources 1-R. The client device 955 can transmit the minimum quorumselection data to the computing device 916, and the computing device canutilize the minimum quorum selection data to determine some or all ofthe quorum data for some or all of the resources. Once quorum data for aresource is determined, it can be stored in local memory module 954and/or can be stored in another memory for access by the computingdevice 916 via the network.

The GUI can be presented with built in quorum requirements, ensuringthat selections made by the user are in accordance with the quorumrequirements. For example, the GUI can enforce that a sum of minimumquorums for all of the set of actor parties is greater than one, or adifferent predefined number. For example, if the sum must be greaterthan one, this can include requiring the minimum quorum selection datato adhere to a number of actor parties in the set of actor parties beinggreater than one, and can include requiring the minimum quorum for eachthe set of actor parties being greater than or equal to one.Alternatively, the user can be allowed to select only one actor party,and the GUI can require that the minimum quorum for the single actorparty be greater than or equal to two if only one actor party isselected by the user.

Different client devices 955 corresponding to different administrators,different owners of different resources, different requestors thatoriginally sent different resources for storage, and/or other differententities can display GUI 965 to different users, enabling thesedifferent resources to generate minimum quorum selection data fordifferent resources for transmission to the computing device 916 at thesame or different times. In some embodiments, the minimum quorumselection data is generated for a resource and transmitted by a clientdevice 955 in conjunction with sending the resource to the computingdevice 916 for storage, ensuring that the resource has quorum data fromthe times it is stored. Alternatively, the minimum quorum selection datacan be generated for all resources and/or any resource that satisfies aparticular condition or falls within a particular category. In thisfashion, quorum data can be set before some or all correspondingresources are sent to the computing device for storage, again ensuringthat resources have quorum data from the time they are stored.

In some embodiments, the minimum quorum for a particular actor party canbe a predefined function of the number of individuals in the actorparty. For example, to require that a majority of end users authorizethe unprotecting of the resource, the minimum quorum can equal to halfof the number of end users in the owner party. Different actor partiescan have different minimum quorum that are equal to different numbersand/or that correspond to different proportions of the number ofindividuals in the corresponding actor party. The same or differentpredefined function for some or all actor parties can be utilized by theclient device 955 to generate the minimum quorum selection data and/orcan be indicated in the minimum quorum selection data based on userinput indicating the predefined function.

Some or all of the quorum data for some or all resources can bedetermined automatically by the computing device 916. For example, thecomputing device 916 can automatically determine the minimum quorum forsome or all actor parties in response to receiving minimum quorumselection data indicating all possible requestors in these actor partiesbased on the predefined function. Alternatively or in addition, thepredefined function for calculating minimum quorum for some or all actorparties can be provided by the client device in the minimum quorumselection data, and the computing device can automatically apply thepredefined function to a determined number of possible requestors inthese actor parties to calculate the value of the minimum quorum. Forexample, the computing device can automatically determine owners of theresource and/or actor parties for the resource based on the requestorthat sent the resource, based on metadata of the resource, and/or basedon other qualities of the resource. The minimum quorum selection datagenerated based on the via user input to client device 955 can indicatea set of rules that the computing device can utilize to determine whichactor parties will be utilized for a given resource and/or to determinethe possible requestors for a given actor party based on qualities of agiven resource.

In some embodiments, the source of a resource and/or an entity that sentthe resource to the computing device to be written to memory isautomatically included in one of the actor parties by the computingdevice, such as an owner party. In some embodiments, an operator of theDSN is always automatically included as the singular member of arequired operator party by the computing device. In some embodiments,the operator of the DSN is determined based on an individual and/orentity associated with the client device 955 that sent minimum quorumselection data for one or more resources. For example, an individualthat set some or all of the quorum data for one or more resources in theDSN via interaction with GUI 965 can be automatically be determined tobe an operator of the DSN, and can be automatically included in theoperator party for the same or different resource for which the quorumdata was sent by this operator. Alternatively or in addition, an ownerof a resource is determined based on an individual and/or entityassociated with the client device 955 that sent minimum quorum selectiondata for the resource. For example, owners can be responsible forsetting some or all of the quorum data for their resources, and anindividual that set some or all of the quorum data for a particularresource via interaction with GUI 965 can automatically be determined tobe an owner of the resource, and can be automatically included in theoperator party for the resource.

FIG. 9B illustrates an embodiment of unprotecting a protected resourceby determining an overall quorum has been achieved. When performing anunprotect operation, each of the requestors that authorize theunprotecting of a resource can present their credentials. Thecredentials identify the requestor which actor party they fall within inperforming the operation. The DSN memory can use this information tokeep track of the number of authorizations received and if the quorumhas been met across all actors.

Consider a plurality of requestors N, which can correspond to allpossible requestors across all actor parties for resource 1. A propersubset of the plurality of requestors N can generate and transmitauthorizations to unprotect resource 1. For example, one or more of therequestors 1-N can utilize a GUI displayed on a corresponding displaydevice to prompt a user to provide and/or deny authorization tounprotect a resource, and authorizations can be generated and sent bythe requestor when the user indicates they wish to provide authorizationto unprotect the resource via user input to the GUI.

As illustrated, M of the N possible requestors can transmit theirauthorizations to unprotect resource 1, where M is less than N. Thecomputing device 916 can receive these authorizations 1-M. A quorumevaluation module 980 can be implemented by utilizing at least oneprocessor of the computing device. The protection status evaluationmodule can determine whether authorization is granted by comparing theauthorizations 1-M for resource 1 to the quorum data for resource 1, forexample, by fetching the quorum data for resource 1 from memory. Thequorum evaluation module 980 evaluation can identify which ones ofrequestors 1-M that sent the authorizations 1-M correspond to each actorparty indicated in the quorum data for resource 1. In particular, arequestor can be compared to enumerated identifiers in an actor party ofresource 1, where the requestor is determined to be a member of theactor party if an identifier of the requestor matches one of theenumerated identifiers in the actor party. Similarly, a requestor can becompared to a set of criteria defining members of an actor party, wherethe requestor is determined to be a member of the actor party if therequestor is determined to compare favorably to the set of criteria. Insome embodiments, credentials validating each requestor is generated andtransmitted by each requestor in conjunction with the authorization. Thecomputing device can utilize the credentials to validate and/ordetermine the identity of each requestor 1-M. These credentials can becompared to the enumerated identifiers and/or set of criteria of anactor party to determine whether the corresponding requestor is a memberof the actor party.

The computing device 916 can thus identify a set of subsets of therequestors 1-M, where each of the set of subsets corresponds to one ofthe actor parties and includes only ones of the requestors 1-Mdetermined to belong to the corresponding actor party. In someembodiments, at least one of the requestors 1-M is determined to belongto none of the actor parties for resource 1, and is thus included innone of the subsets. The computing device can compare the number ofrequestors in each subset to the minimum quorum of the correspondingactor party. The minimum quorum of an actor party can be determined tobe met when the number of requestors in the subset for the actor partyis greater than or equal to the value of the minimum quorum. The minimumquorum of an actor party can be determined to be unmet when the numberof requestors in the subset for the actor party is less than the valueof the minimum quorum.

In some embodiments, a minimum quorum's worth of authorizations must bereceived for each actor party for an overall quorum to be determined bythe quorum evaluation module 980, ensuring that all actor parties havemet their corresponding minimum quorum for an overall quorum to bereached. If this condition is met, the corresponding resource is changedfrom protected to unprotected, and modification and/or deletion of theresource can be facilitated. If this condition is not met, thecorresponding resource is not changed to an unprotected status, and theprotected status of the resource is maintained. For example, if aminimum quorum of any one of the actor parties is not met.

In other embodiments, only a proper subset of actor parties need to meettheir corresponding minimum quorums for the overall quorum to bedetermined and for the resource to become unprotected, where the minimumquorum is not met for at least one of the actor parties. The quorum datacan indicate whether or not minimum quorums must be met by every actorparty, for example, based on an indication in the minimum quorumselection data received from the client device. If the quorum dataindicates that minimum quorums need only be met by a proper subset ofactor parties, the quorum data can further indicate which proper subsetsare acceptable. For example, a plurality of different proper subsets ofthe actor parties with their minimum quorums met can all be validsolutions in establishing an overall quorum. These proper subsets can bethe same or different in size. For example, some proper subsets mayinclude all but one of the actor parties, other proper subsets aremissing two or more of the actor parties. The number of actor partiesrequired for different proper subsets can be a function of a determinedimportance and/or weight of the roles of the actor parties themselves.For example, a first proper subset of actor parties may include feweractor parties than a second proper subset of actor parties in responsethe first proper subset including one or more actor parties that aremore important than and/or whose authorization holds more weight thanone or more actor parties in the second proper subset.

As discussed previously, additional roles for additional actor partiescan also be specified to participate in order to form an overall quorum.As an example of less than all of the actor parties needing to meettheir minimum quorums, the system can define an actor party that canserves as an arbitrator. An arbitrator party can help arbitrate anydisputes between other actors and/or can provide authorization on behalfof a nonparticipating actor. In such embodiments, the quorum data canindicate that any combination of actor parties that includes all but oneof the actor parties can be utilized to achieve overall quorum if theminimum quorums of all but one of the actor parties are met, because thearbitrator party is either included in the proper subset of actorparties to replace a nonparticipating actor party, or all of the otherrequired actor parties are participating and thus the arbitrator partyis not necessary. In some embodiments, the quorum data can specify thatthe arbitrator party can only be utilized to provide authorization onbehalf of some actor parties, but not other actor parties, where theseother actor parties are always required for overall quorum to beachieved.

In some embodiments, a secondary minimum quorum that indicates a highernumber of required requestors than the first minimum quorum can beindicated for at least one actor party in the quorum data. If thesecondary minimum quorum for an actor party is met, then the minimumquorum for another actor party need not be met for overall quorum to beachieved. If the first minimum quorum for this actor party is met butthe secondary minimum quorum for this actor party is not met, then theminimum quorum for the other actor party must still be met for overallquorum to be achieved. For example, the first minimum quorum for anowner party can be equal to one, and the secondary minimum quorum for anowner party can be equal to half of the total number of end users. Ifthis secondary minimum quorum of the owner party is met for a resource,then the resource can become unprotected even if the operator does notprovide authorization. If at least one end user provides authorizationbut this secondary minimum quorum of the owner party is not met for aresource, the resource can only become unprotected if the operator alsoprovides authorization.

In some embodiments, if the overall quorum is not met but is within apredefined threshold number of requestors away from the overall quorum,the computing device can transmit notifications requesting authorizationof the resource to some or all remaining ones of the requestors thathave not transmitted authorization and/or that have also not senttransmissions denying authorization. For example, if a particular actorparty is one requestor and/or within a threshold number of requestorsaway from its minimum quorum, the requestors of these actor parties canbe sent the notifications. The notification indicating a request toauthorize the resource can be displayed by the requestor to a user via adisplay device. The notification can indicate the individuals and/or theentire actor parties that have already provided authorization.Authorizations of the resource can be received from some or alladditional requestors wishing to provide authorization in response tothe authorization request, and the quorum evaluation module 980 can beutilized to reevaluate whether quorum is reached based on theseadditional authorizations.

In some embodiments, the quorum data indicates a timeout window forauthorization, which can be the same or different for differentresources. Only authorizations received within a temporal period thatdoes not exceed the timeout window, and/or only authorizations that arereceived after a time dictated by the time window and the current time,are considered by the resource modification module to determine whetheroverall quorum is met. In these embodiments, if at least oneauthorization from at least one requestor was determined to have beenreceived outside the timeout window, and/or if it is determined thatoverall quorum is not reached but would have been reached if not for thetimeout window, notifications can be sent to these requestors indicatingthat the requestors should retransmit their authorization to thecomputing device 916 if they still authorize unprotecting the resource.The computing device can then utilize subsequently retransmittedauthorizations in evaluating whether overall quorum is met.

The computing device 916 can determine the resulting protection statusof the resource based on whether or not overall quorum is determined tobe met, where the protection status of the resource is changed tounprotected when overall quorum is met, and where the protection statusof the resource is maintained as protected when overall quorum is notmet. The resulting protection status and/or outcome of the quorum can beindicated in a notification generated by the computing device andtransmitted to some or all of the requestors 1-N. This can includetransmitting the outcome to requestors that did not provideauthorization but are included as possible requestors for an actor partyof the resource. Alternatively, the notification can be transmitted bythe computing device 916 to only the requestors 1-M that providedauthorization. The resulting protection can further be communicated tothe memory, for example, when the protection status of the resource isto be changed.

As illustrated in FIG. 9C, when the protection status of resource 1 isdetermined to be changed to unprotected by the quorum evaluation module980, the protection status of resource 1 can be changed in memoryaccordingly. A resource modification request can be received from arequestor via the network, indicating a request to modify and/or deleteresource 1. A resource modification module 982 can be implemented by atleast one processor of the computing device 916, and can be operable tomodify the resource in memory of the DSN based on the modificationrequest. This can include first querying the status of the resource inmemory module 954 to verify that the resource is unprotected. Ifresource is unprotected, the modification can be facilitated by theresource modification module 982. This can include facilitatingreplacing, modifying, and/or deleting the resource currently stored inthe DSN. For example, a modification request indicating a modifiedversion of the resource can be utilized by the resource modificationmodule 982 to generate a IDA width threshold number of encoded dataslices 1-S for at least one data segment of the modified version of theresource by performing a dispersed storage error encoding function onthe modified version of the resource, and the encoded data slices 1-Scan be transmitted to storage units 936 to replace the previous versionof the resource.

In some embodiments, the modification request is only executed by thecomputing device 916 if received from a requestor that is determined tobelong to one of the actor parties of the resource. The computing devicecan determine whether the requestor belongs to an actor party of theresource as discussed in conjunction with FIG. 9B, for example, based onthe quorum data for the resource and/or based on credentials provided bythe requestor in conjunction with the modification request.

If the protection status of resource 1 indicates that resource 1 isstill protected, the modification is not employed and a transmission canbe sent back to the requestor indicating that the resource is stillprotected. In some embodiments, receiving a modification request for aprotected can initiate the authorization process to unprotect theresource. For example, in response to receiving the modificationrequest, the computing device can transmit authorization requests to therequestors 1-N indicated as possible requestors for the actor parties ofthe resource in the quorum data, notifying these requestors that themodification of the resource is requested, notifying the requestors ofthe identity of the particular requestor that requested the modificationof the resource, notifying the requestors of the particular modificationof the resource that is requested and/or otherwise requesting theserequestors provide authorization to unprotect the resource if they wish.The authorizations can be received from at least one requestor wishingto provide authorization in response, and the quorum evaluation module980 can determine whether quorum is reached as discussed in conjunctionwith FIG. 9B. If quorum is reached, the modification in the request canbe facilitated.

In such embodiments, the unprotection status can be active only for thepurpose for modifying the resource as requested in the modificationrequest, for example, in cases where the notification indicates therequested modification and/or particular requestor of the modification,and/or where the authorizations correspond to authorization to performthis modification only. In such embodiments, only the modification inthe request is facilitated and/or only modifications requested by thisauthorized requestor are facilitated. The resource remains protectedagainst other subsequent modifications and/or against othermodifications by different users unless quorum is also reached in thisfashion for the other modifications and/or the other requestors.

The embodiments discussed in FIGS. 9A-9C illustrate the computing device16 being implemented as a dispersed storage and task (DST) processingunit that communicates with a plurality of storage units storing encodedslices generated by the DST processing unit, operable to determine whenan overall quorum is reached for modification of a resource stored as aplurality of encoded slices in a plurality of storage units. However, inother embodiments, the same functionality discussed herein can beutilized by any computing device that includes a processor and memory todetermine when overall quorum is reached for a resource corresponding toany type of data that is not necessarily dispersed stored in memory, tounprotect the resource, and/or to facilitate modification of theresource, for example, stored in a single location and/or stored inlocal memory. Any computing device with a processor and memory thatstores resources can be utilized to store quorum data for its resourcesstored in its memory or other memory to which it has access; receiveauthorizations from requestors to unprotect a resource stored in itsmemory or other memory to which it has access; implement the quorumevaluation module 980 or otherwise determine if an overall quorum hasbeen achieved to unprotect a resource; monitor and/or modify theprotection status of resources stored in its memory or other memory towhich it has access; receive requests to modify unprotected and/orprotected resources; implement the resource modification module 982 orotherwise facilitate modification of an unprotected resource stored inits memory or other memory to which it has access; and/or perform someor all of the other functionality of the computing device 916 discussedherein to determine when overall quorum is reached, to unprotect acorresponding resource, and/or to facilitate modification of theresource stored in a single location, dispersed stored in multiplelocations, stored in local memory, and/or stored in other memoryaccessible via network 24.

In some embodiments, a storage unit 936 is implemented as such acomputing device 916, for example, where encoded data slices that arereceived from a DST processing unit or other requesting entity forstorage correspond to the resources, and where the storage unit 936changes the status of encoded data slices from a protected tounprotected status for modification when an overall quorum isestablished as discussed herein. For example, the encoded data slicescan be received by the storage unit 936 from another computing device916 and/or from a computing device 16 that is operable to dispersedstorage error encoded data into a plurality of data slices for storagein the plurality of storage units 936, and the storage unit 936 canmaintain and change the protection status of the encoded data slices itreceives and stores by utilizing a quorum evaluation module 980 and/or aresource modification module 982. Alternatively, the computing device916 can implemented as any storage unit that can store any data locallyin memory, for example, in response to write requests received from arequesting entity.

While FIGS. 9A-9C depict modification of resources in a DSN, themodification of resources can be authorized without utilizing thedispersed storage network of FIGS. 1-8. The computing device can beimplemented utilizing any processor and memory to facilitateauthorization to modify resources it manages as discussed herein, forexample, by utilizing the quorum evaluation module 980 and/or theresource modification module 982. Alternatively or in addition, theresources can correspond to any data that is not necessarily dispersedstored. The resources can be stored locally by the computing device 916in its own memory, or can be stored in another memory accessible via anycommunication network.

In various embodiments, some or all of the quorums data for some or allof the resources 1-R can be considered additional resources themselves.Thus, the quorum data can similarly be protected, where the quorum datafor a particular resource can only be modified if a similar, additionalquorum is met for the additional resource corresponding to the quorumdata. For example, multiple client devices 955 and/or multipleadministrators of one or more actor parties can be required to authorizechanges to the quorum data for one or more resources in accordance withadditional quorum data for the resource corresponding to the quorumdata, where the additional quorum data similarly defines minimum quorumsrequired for one or more designated actor parties as discussed herein.This additional quorum data can be fixed, can be defined via clientdevice 955, and/or can be modified in accordance with its own, furtheradditional quorum.

In various embodiments, a processing system of a dispersed storage andtask (DST) processing unit or other computing device includes at leastone processor and a memory that stores operational instructions, thatwhen executed by the at least one processor cause the processing systemto facilitate storage of a resource in memory managed by the computingdevice, such as a dispersed storage network. A protection status of theresource is set to a protected status in response to facilitatingstorage of the resource. A set of actor parties required to authorize achange of the protection status of the resource from the protectedstatus to an unprotected status are determined. A minimum quorum isdetermined for each of the set of actor parties required to authorize achange of the protection status of the resource from the protectedstatus to the unprotected status. A plurality of authorizations tochange the protection status of the resource from the protected statusto the unprotected status from a plurality of requestors are receivedfrom a plurality of requestors via the network. A plurality of subsetsof the plurality of requestors are identified, where each one of theplurality of subsets corresponds to one of the set of actor parties. Theprotection status of the resource is set to the unprotected status inresponse to determining, for every one of the set of actor parties, thata number of requestors in a corresponding one of the plurality ofsubsets of the plurality of requestors is greater than or equal to theminimum quorum for the one of the set of actor parties. This system canbe utilized to prevent a single malicious actor from abusing theunprotect mechanism while also assuring an end user that their protectedresources cannot be unprotected without their consent.

FIG. 10 is a flowchart illustrating an example of authorizingmodifications of resources, for example, in a DSN. In particular, amethod is presented for use in association with one or more functionsand features described in conjunction with FIGS. 1-9C, for execution bya computing device such as a dispersed storage and task (DST) processingunit, a storage unit, or another device, for example, of the DSN. Thecomputing device can include at least one processor and memory thatstores instruction that configure the processor or processors to performthe steps described below.

Step 1002 includes facilitating storage of a resource in memory, forexample, managed by the computing device, such as a dispersed storagenetwork. Step 1004 includes setting a protection status of the resourceto a protected status in response to facilitating storage of theresource. Step 1006 includes determining a set of actor parties requiredto authorize a change of the protection status of the resource from theprotected status to an unprotected status. Step 1008 includesdetermining a minimum quorum for each of the set of actor partiesrequired to authorize a change of the protection status of the resourcefrom the protected status to the unprotected status. Step 1010 includesreceiving, from a plurality of requestors via a network, a plurality ofauthorizations to change the protection status of the resource from theprotected status to the unprotected status. Step 1012 includesidentifying a plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors, whereeach one of the plurality of subsets corresponds to one of the set ofactor parties. Step 1014 includes setting the protection status of theresource to the unprotected status in response to determining, for everyone of the set of actor parties, that a number of requestors in acorresponding one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality ofrequestors is greater than or equal to the minimum quorum for the one ofthe set of actor parties.

In various embodiments, the method further includes receiving, via thenetwork, a request indicating a modification of the resource. The methodfurther includes facilitating the modification of the resource inresponse to determining the protection status of the resource is set asthe unprotected status. In various embodiments, the request is receivedfrom one of the plurality of requestors, and the modification of theresource is facilitated in further response to determining that the oneof the plurality of requestors corresponds to one of the set of actorparties.

In various embodiments, the method further includes maintaining theprotection status of the resource as the protected status in response todetermining, for one of the set of actor parties, that the number ofrequestors in the corresponding one of the plurality of subsets of theplurality of requestors is less than the minimum quorum for the one ofthe set of actor parties. For example, this step can replace step 1014when it is determined, for one of the set of actor parties, that thenumber of requestors in the corresponding one of the plurality ofsubsets of the plurality of requestors is less than the minimum quorumfor the one of the set of actor parties.

In various embodiments, identifying the plurality of subsets of theplurality of requestors includes extracting credential data from atleast one of the plurality of authorizations. Each one of the pluralityof subsets includes only ones of the plurality of requestors withcredential data extracted from corresponding ones of the plurality ofauthorizations indicating the ones of the plurality of requestors arevalidated as members of one of the set of actor parties corresponding tothe one of the plurality of subsets. In various embodiments, at leastone of the plurality of requestors is included in none of the pluralityof subsets in response to determining that the credential data for theat least one of the plurality of requestors indicates the at least oneof the plurality of requestors is not validated as a member of any ofthe set of actor parties.

In various embodiments, a number of actor parties in the set of actorparties is greater than one, and the minimum quorum for each the set ofactor parties is greater than or equal to one. In various embodiments, afirst one of the set of actor parties corresponds to an owner party, anda second one of the set of actor parties corresponds to an operatorparty. The owner party corresponds to a plurality of end users, and theoperator party includes a single operator. The minimum quorum for theoperator party is equal to one, and the protection status of theresource is set to the unprotected status in response to determiningthat the number of requestors in a first one of the plurality of subsetsof the plurality of requestors corresponding to the owner party isgreater than or equal to a minimum quorum for the owner party, and/or infurther response to determining that the number of requestors in asecond one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestorscorresponding to the operator party includes the single operator. Invarious embodiments, the method includes determining the plurality ofend users in the owner party based on identifying a plurality of endusers corresponding to the resource. In various embodiments, the minimumquorum for the owner party is greater than one.

In various embodiments, an additional actor party corresponds to anarbitrator party. The method further includes identifying an arbitratorsubset of the plurality of requestors, where the arbitrator subsetincludes ones of the plurality of requestors corresponding to thearbitrator party. The method further includes determining, for exactlyone of the set of actor parties, that a number of requestors in acorresponding one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality ofrequestors is less than the minimum quorum for the one of the set ofactor parties. The method further includes setting the protection statusof the resource to the unprotected status in response to determining,for all remaining ones of the set of actor parties, that a number ofrequestors in a corresponding one of the plurality of subsets of theplurality of requestors is greater than or equal to the minimum quorumfor the one of the set of actor parties, and/or in response to furtherdetermining that a number of requestors in the arbitrator subset isgreater than or equal to a minimum quorum for the one of the set ofactor parties.

In various embodiments, the method includes receiving minimum quorumselection data. For example, the minimum quorum selection data wasgenerated by a client device corresponding to an administrator based onuser input to a graphical user interface in response to a promptpresented by the graphical user interface, where the graphical userinterface was displayed by a display device of the client device. Theminimum quorum is determined for each of the set of actor parties basedon the minimum quorum selection data. In various embodiments, a sum ofminimum quorums for all of the set of actor parties is greater than onein response to the prompt presented by the graphical user interfacerequiring the minimum quorum selection data to adhere to a number ofactor parties in the set of actor parties being greater than one, andthe minimum quorum for each the set of actor parties being greater thanor equal to one.

In various embodiments, the minimum quorum for at least one of the setof actor parties is calculated as a function of a number of possiblerequestors included in the at least one of the set of actor parties,where the number of possible requestors included in the at least one ofthe set of actor parties is greater than one.

In various embodiments, the computing device is implemented as adispersed storage and task (DST) processing unit, and the resourceincludes a data segment. Facilitating storage of the resource includesdispersed storage error encoding the data segment to produce a set ofencoded data slices for storage in a set of storage units and furtherincludes transmitting the set of encoded data slices for storage to theset of storage units via the network. Facilitating modification of theresource can include facilitating replacement of the resource by amodified resource by dispersed storage error encoding a data segment ofthe modified resources to produce a set of updated encoded data slicesto replace the set of original encoded data slices for the original datasegment in the set of storage units. The set of updated encoded dataslices can be transmitted for storage to the set of storage units viathe network, and some or all of the set of storage units can replace anoriginal encoded data slice with a received updated encoded data slice.

In various embodiments, the computing device 916 is implemented as astorage unit, and the resource corresponds to an encoded data slice. Theencoded data slice is received for storage from a DST processing unit.The DST processing unit generated the encoded data slice by dispersedstorage error encoding a data segment to produce a set of encoded dataslices that includes the encoded data slice for storage in a set ofstorage units that includes the storage unit. Facilitating storage ofresource includes storing the encoded data slice in a memory device ofthe storage unit.

In various embodiments, a non-transitory computer readable storagemedium includes at least one memory section that stores operationalinstructions that, when executed by a processing system, for example, ofa dispersed storage network (DSN), that includes a processor and amemory, causes the processing system to facilitate storage of a resourcein memory of the dispersed storage network or other memory associatedwith the processing system. A protection status of the resource is setto a protected status in response to facilitating storage of theresource. A set of actor parties required to authorize a change of theprotection status of the resource from the protected status to anunprotected status are determined. A minimum quorum is determined foreach of the set of actor parties required to authorize a change of theprotection status of the resource from the protected status to theunprotected status. A plurality of authorizations to change theprotection status of the resource from the protected status to theunprotected status from a plurality of requestors are received from aplurality of requestors via the network. A plurality of subsets of theplurality of requestors are identified, where each one of the pluralityof subsets corresponds to one of the set of actor parties. Theprotection status of the resource is set to the unprotected status inresponse to determining, for every one of the set of actor parties, thata number of requestors in a corresponding one of the plurality ofsubsets of the plurality of requestors is greater than or equal to theminimum quorum for the one of the set of actor parties.

FIG. 11 presents an illustrative cloud computing environment 2050. Asshown, cloud computing environment 2050 includes one or more cloudcomputing nodes 2010 with which local computing devices used by cloudconsumers, such as, for example, personal digital assistant (PDA) orcellular telephone 2054A, desktop computer 2054B, laptop computer 2054C,and/or automobile computer system 2054N may communicate. Nodes 2010 maycommunicate with one another. They may be grouped (not shown) physicallyor virtually, in one or more networks, such as Private, Community,Public, or Hybrid clouds as described hereinabove, or a combinationthereof. This allows cloud computing environment 2050 to offerinfrastructure, platforms and/or software as services for which a cloudconsumer does not need to maintain resources on a local computingdevice. It is understood that the types of computing devices 2054A-Nshown in FIG. 11 are intended to be illustrative only and that computingnodes 2010 and cloud computing environment 2050 can communicate with anytype of computerized device over any type of network and/or networkaddressable connection (e.g., using a web browser).

It is to be understood that although this disclosure includes a detaileddescription on cloud computing, implementation of the teachings recitedherein are not limited to a cloud computing environment. Rather,embodiments of the present invention are capable of being implemented inconjunction with any other type of computing environment now known orlater developed.

Cloud computing is a model of service delivery for enabling convenient,on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computingresources (e.g., networks, network bandwidth, servers, processing,memory, storage, applications, virtual machines, and services) that canbe rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort orinteraction with a provider of the service. This cloud model may includeat least five characteristics, at least three service models, and atleast four deployment models.

Characteristics are as follows:

On-demand self-service: a cloud consumer can unilaterally provisioncomputing capabilities, such as server time and network storage, asneeded automatically without requiring human interaction with theservice's provider.

Broad network access: capabilities are available over a network andaccessed through standard mechanisms that promote use by heterogeneousthin or thick client platforms (e.g., mobile phones, laptops, and PDAs).

Resource pooling: the provider's computing resources are pooled to servemultiple consumers using a multi-tenant model, with different physicaland virtual resources dynamically assigned and reassigned according todemand. There is a sense of location independence in that the consumergenerally has no control or knowledge over the exact location of theprovided resources but may be able to specify location at a higher levelof abstraction (e.g., country, state, or datacenter).

Rapid elasticity: capabilities can be rapidly and elasticallyprovisioned, in some cases automatically, to quickly scale out andrapidly released to quickly scale in. To the consumer, the capabilitiesavailable for provisioning often appear to be unlimited and can bepurchased in any quantity at any time.

Measured service: cloud systems automatically control and optimizeresource use by leveraging a metering capability at some level ofabstraction appropriate to the type of service (e.g., storage,processing, bandwidth, and active user accounts). Resource usage can bemonitored, controlled, and reported, providing transparency for both theprovider and consumer of the utilized service.

Service Models are as follows:

Software as a Service (SaaS): the capability provided to the consumer isto use the provider's applications running on a cloud infrastructure.The applications are accessible from various client devices through athin client interface such as a web browser (e.g., web-based e-mail).The consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloudinfrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, storage,or even individual application capabilities, with the possible exceptionof limited user-specific application configuration settings.

Platform as a Service (PaaS): the capability provided to the consumer isto deploy onto the cloud infrastructure consumer-created or acquiredapplications created using programming languages and tools supported bythe provider. The consumer does not manage or control the underlyingcloud infrastructure including networks, servers, operating systems, orstorage, but has control over the deployed applications and possiblyapplication hosting environment configurations.

Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS): the capability provided to theconsumer is to provision processing, storage, networks, and otherfundamental computing resources where the consumer is able to deploy andrun arbitrary software, which can include operating systems andapplications. The consumer does not manage or control the underlyingcloud infrastructure but has control over operating systems, storage,deployed applications, and possibly limited control of select networkingcomponents (e.g., host firewalls).

Deployment Models are as follows:

Private cloud: the cloud infrastructure is operated solely for anorganization. It may be managed by the organization or a third party andmay exist on-premises or off-premises.

Community cloud: the cloud infrastructure is shared by severalorganizations and supports a specific community that has shared concerns(e.g., mission, security requirements, policy, and complianceconsiderations). It may be managed by the organizations or a third partyand may exist on-premises or off-premises.

Public cloud: the cloud infrastructure is made available to the generalpublic or a large industry group and is owned by an organization sellingcloud services.

Hybrid cloud: the cloud infrastructure is a composition of two or moreclouds (private, community, or public) that remain unique entities butare bound together by standardized or proprietary technology thatenables data and application portability (e.g., cloud bursting forload-balancing between clouds).

A cloud computing environment is service oriented with a focus onstatelessness, low coupling, modularity, and semantic interoperability.At the heart of cloud computing is an infrastructure that includes anetwork of interconnected nodes.

In various embodiments, the DSN can be implemented by utilizing thecloud computing environment 2050 and/or can communicate with cloudcomputing environment 2050.

Alternatively or in addition, the plurality of computing devices 12-16of FIG. 1, the managing unit of FIG. 1, and/or the integrity processingunit 20 of FIG. 1, and/or storage units 36 can be implemented byutilizing cloud computing nodes 2010, personal digital assistant (PDA)or cellular telephone 2054A, desktop computer 2054B, laptop computer2054C, and/or automobile computer system 2054N. In various embodiments,the cloud computing nodes 2010, personal digital assistant (PDA) orcellular telephone 2054A, desktop computer 2054B, laptop computer 2054C,and/or automobile computer system 2054N can communicate by utilizingnetwork 24 of FIG. 1.

Referring now to FIG. 12, a set of functional abstraction layersprovided by cloud computing environment 2050 (FIG. 11) is shown. Itshould be understood in advance that the components, layers, andfunctions shown in FIG. 12 are intended to be illustrative only andembodiments of the invention are not limited thereto. As depicted, thefollowing layers and corresponding functions are provided:

Hardware and software layer 2060 includes hardware and softwarecomponents. Examples of hardware components include: mainframes 2061;RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) architecture based servers 2062;servers 2063; blade servers 2064; storage devices 2065; and networks andnetworking components 2066. In some embodiments, software componentsinclude network application server software 2067 and database software2068. In some embodiments, one or more hardware components can beimplemented by utilizing the computing device 2300 of FIG. 13.

Virtualization layer 2070 provides an abstraction layer from which thefollowing examples of virtual entities may be provided: virtual servers2071; virtual storage 2072; virtual networks 2073, including virtualprivate networks; virtual applications and operating systems 2074; andvirtual clients 2075.

In one example, management layer 2080 may provide the functionsdescribed below. Resource provisioning 2081 provides dynamic procurementof computing resources and other resources that are utilized to performtasks within the cloud computing environment. Metering and Pricing 2082provide cost tracking as resources are utilized within the cloudcomputing environment, and billing or invoicing for consumption of theseresources. In one example, these resources may include applicationsoftware licenses. Security provides identity verification for cloudconsumers and tasks, as well as protection for data and other resources.User portal 2083 provides access to the cloud computing environment forconsumers and system administrators. Service level management 2084provides cloud computing resource allocation and management such thatrequired service levels are met. Service Level Agreement (SLA) planningand fulfillment 2085 provide pre-arrangement for, and procurement of,cloud computing resources for which a future requirement is anticipatedin accordance with an SLA.

Workloads layer 2090 provides examples of functionality for which thecloud computing environment may be utilized. Examples of workloads andfunctions which may be provided from this layer include: mapping andnavigation 2091; software development and lifecycle management 2092;virtual classroom education delivery 2093; data analytics processing2094; transaction processing 2095; and resource modificationauthorization 2096. In some embodiments, the DSN 10 can utilizeutilizing the cloud computing environment 2050, for example, byutilizing the resource modification authorization 2096 of the workloadslayer 2090 of FIG. 12 to perform authorization to modify resources inthe DSN, based on latency and/or throughput, as described in conjunctionwith FIGS. 1-10, where some or all computing devices 12-16 of FIG. 1and/or where one or more computing devices 916 of FIGS. 9A-9Ccommunicate with the network via a corresponding node 2010 of the cloudcomputing environment 2050.

FIG. 13 depicts a block diagram of components of a computing device2300, which can be utilized to implement some or all of the cloudcomputing nodes 2010, some or all of the computing devices 54A-N of FIG.11, and/or to implement other computing devices described herein inaccordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The computingdevice 2300 can be utilized to implement some or all of the plurality ofcomputing devices 12-16 of FIG. 1, the DS client module 34 of FIG. 1,the managing unit of FIG. 1, the integrity processing unit 20 of FIG. 1,and/or storage units 36 of FIG. 1. For example the computing core 26 ofFIG. 2 can be implemented by utilizing the computing device 2300. Itshould be appreciated that FIG. 13 provides only an illustration of oneimplementation and does not imply any limitations with regard to theenvironments in which different embodiments may be implemented. Manymodifications to the depicted environment may be made.

Computing device 2300 can include one or more processors 2302, one ormore computer-readable RAMs 2304, one or more computer-readable ROMs2306, one or more computer readable storage media 2308, device drivers2312, read/write drive or interface 2314, and network adapter orinterface 2316, all interconnected over a communications fabric 2318.Communications fabric 2318 can be implemented with any architecturedesigned for passing data and/or control information between processors(such as microprocessors, communications and network processors, etc.),system memory, peripheral devices, and any other hardware componentswithin the system.

One or more operating systems 2310 and/or application programs 2311,such as network application server software 2067 and database software2068, are stored on one or more of the computer readable storage media2308 for execution by one or more of the processors 2302 via one or moreof the respective RAMs 2304 (which typically include cache memory). Inthe illustrated embodiment, each of the computer readable storage media2308 can be a magnetic disk storage device of an internal hard drive,CD-ROM, DVD, memory stick, magnetic tape, magnetic disk, optical disk, asemiconductor storage device such as RAM, ROM, EPROM, flash memory, orany other computer readable storage media that can store a computerprogram and digital information, in accordance with embodiments of theinvention.

Computing device 2300 can also include a R/W drive or interface 2314 toread from and write to one or more portable computer readable storagemedia 2326. Application programs 2311 on computing devices 2300 can bestored on one or more of the portable computer readable storage media2326, read via the respective R/W drive or interface 2314 and loadedinto the respective computer readable storage media 2308.

Computing device 2300 can also include a network adapter or interface2316, such as a TCP/IP adapter card or wireless communication adapter.Application programs 2311 on computing devices 2054A-N can be downloadedto the computing device from an external computer or external storagedevice via a network (for example, the Internet, a local area network orother wide area networks or wireless networks) and network adapter orinterface 2316. From the network adapter or interface 2316, the programsmay be loaded into the computer readable storage media 2308. The networkmay comprise copper wires, optical fibers, wireless transmission,routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and edge servers.

Computing device 2300 can also include a display screen 2320, a keyboardor keypad 2322, and a computer mouse or touchpad 2324. Device drivers2312 interface to display screen 2320 for imaging, to keyboard or keypad2322, to computer mouse or touchpad 2324, and/or to display screen 2320for pressure sensing of alphanumeric character entry and userselections. The device drivers 2312, R/W drive or interface 2314, andnetwork adapter or interface 2316 can comprise hardware and softwarestored in computer readable storage media 2308 and/or ROM 2306.

It is noted that terminologies as may be used herein such as bit stream,stream, signal sequence, etc. (or their equivalents) have been usedinterchangeably to describe digital information whose contentcorresponds to any of a number of desired types (e.g., data, video,speech, text, graphics, audio, etc. any of which may generally bereferred to as ‘data’).

As may be used herein, the terms “substantially” and “approximately”provides an industry-accepted tolerance for its corresponding termand/or relativity between items. For some industries, anindustry-accepted tolerance is less than one percent and, for otherindustries, the industry-accepted tolerance is 10 percent or more.Industry-accepted tolerances correspond to, but are not limited to,component values, integrated circuit process variations, temperaturevariations, rise and fall times, thermal noise, dimensions, signalingerrors, dropped packets, temperatures, pressures, material compositions,and/or performance metrics. Within an industry, tolerance variances ofaccepted tolerances may be more or less than a percentage level (e.g.,dimension tolerance of less than +/−1%).

As may also be used herein, the term(s) “configured to”, “operablycoupled to”, “coupled to”, and/or “coupling” includes direct couplingbetween items and/or indirect coupling between items via an interveningitem (e.g., an item includes, but is not limited to, a component, anelement, a circuit, and/or a module) where, for an example of indirectcoupling, the intervening item does not modify the information of asignal but may adjust its current level, voltage level, and/or powerlevel. As may further be used herein, inferred coupling (i.e., where oneelement is coupled to another element by inference) includes direct andindirect coupling between two items in the same manner as “coupled to”.

As may even further be used herein, the term “configured to”, “operableto”, “coupled to”, or “operably coupled to” indicates that an itemincludes one or more of power connections, input(s), output(s), etc., toperform, when activated, one or more its corresponding functions and mayfurther include inferred coupling to one or more other items. As maystill further be used herein, the term “associated with”, includesdirect and/or indirect coupling of separate items and/or one item beingembedded within another item.

As may be used herein, the term “compares favorably”, indicates that acomparison between two or more items, signals, etc., provides a desiredrelationship. For example, when the desired relationship is that signal1 has a greater magnitude than signal 2, a favorable comparison may beachieved when the magnitude of signal 1 is greater than that of signal 2or when the magnitude of signal 2 is less than that of signal 1. As maybe used herein, the term “compares unfavorably”, indicates that acomparison between two or more items, signals, etc., fails to providethe desired relationship.

As may be used herein, one or more claims may include, in a specificform of this generic form, the phrase “at least one of a, b, and c” orof this generic form “at least one of a, b, or c”, with more or lesselements than “a”, “b”, and “c”. In either phrasing, the phrases are tobe interpreted identically. In particular, “at least one of a, b, and c”is equivalent to “at least one of a, b, or c” and shall mean a, b,and/or c. As an example, it means: “a” only, “b” only, “c” only, “a” and“b”, “a” and “c”, “b” and “c”, and/or “a”, “b”, and “c”.

As may also be used herein, the terms “processing system”, “processingmodule”, “processing circuit”, “processor”, and/or “processing unit” maybe a single processing device or a plurality of processing devices. Sucha processing device may be a microprocessor, micro-controller, digitalsignal processor, microcomputer, central processing unit, fieldprogrammable gate array, programmable logic device, state machine, logiccircuitry, analog circuitry, digital circuitry, and/or any device thatmanipulates signals (analog and/or digital) based on hard coding of thecircuitry and/or operational instructions. The processing module,module, processing circuit, processing system, and/or processing unitmay be, or further include, memory and/or an integrated memory element,which may be a single memory device, a plurality of memory devices,and/or embedded circuitry of another processing module, module,processing circuit, processing system, and/or processing unit. Such amemory device may be a read-only memory, random access memory, volatilememory, non-volatile memory, static memory, dynamic memory, flashmemory, cache memory, and/or any device that stores digital information.Note that if the processing module, module, processing circuit,processing system, and/or processing unit includes more than oneprocessing device, the processing devices may be centrally located(e.g., directly coupled together via a wired and/or wireless busstructure) or may be distributedly located (e.g., cloud computing viaindirect coupling via a local area network and/or a wide area network).Further note that if the processing module, module, processing circuit,processing system, and/or processing unit implements one or more of itsfunctions via a state machine, analog circuitry, digital circuitry,and/or logic circuitry, the memory and/or memory element storing thecorresponding operational instructions may be embedded within, orexternal to, the circuitry comprising the state machine, analogcircuitry, digital circuitry, and/or logic circuitry. Still further notethat, the memory element may store, and the processing module, module,processing circuit, processing system, and/or processing unit executes,hard coded and/or operational instructions corresponding to at leastsome of the steps and/or functions illustrated in one or more of theFigures. Such a memory device or memory element can be included in anarticle of manufacture.

One or more embodiments have been described above with the aid of methodsteps illustrating the performance of specified functions andrelationships thereof. The boundaries and sequence of these functionalbuilding blocks and method steps have been arbitrarily defined hereinfor convenience of description. Alternate boundaries and sequences canbe defined so long as the specified functions and relationships areappropriately performed. Any such alternate boundaries or sequences arethus within the scope and spirit of the claims. Further, the boundariesof these functional building blocks have been arbitrarily defined forconvenience of description. Alternate boundaries could be defined aslong as the certain significant functions are appropriately performed.Similarly, flow diagram blocks may also have been arbitrarily definedherein to illustrate certain significant functionality.

To the extent used, the flow diagram block boundaries and sequence couldhave been defined otherwise and still perform the certain significantfunctionality. Such alternate definitions of both functional buildingblocks and flow diagram blocks and sequences are thus within the scopeand spirit of the claims. One of average skill in the art will alsorecognize that the functional building blocks, and other illustrativeblocks, modules and components herein, can be implemented as illustratedor by discrete components, application specific integrated circuits,processors executing appropriate software and the like or anycombination thereof.

In addition, a flow diagram may include a “start” and/or “continue”indication. The “start” and “continue” indications reflect that thesteps presented can optionally be incorporated in or otherwise used inconjunction with other routines. In this context, “start” indicates thebeginning of the first step presented and may be preceded by otheractivities not specifically shown. Further, the “continue” indicationreflects that the steps presented may be performed multiple times and/ormay be succeeded by other activities not specifically shown. Further,while a flow diagram indicates a particular ordering of steps, otherorderings are likewise possible provided that the principles ofcausality are maintained.

The one or more embodiments are used herein to illustrate one or moreaspects, one or more features, one or more concepts, and/or one or moreexamples. A physical embodiment of an apparatus, an article ofmanufacture, a machine, and/or of a process may include one or more ofthe aspects, features, concepts, examples, etc. described with referenceto one or more of the embodiments discussed herein. Further, from figureto figure, the embodiments may incorporate the same or similarly namedfunctions, steps, modules, etc. that may use the same or differentreference numbers and, as such, the functions, steps, modules, etc. maybe the same or similar functions, steps, modules, etc. or differentones.

While the transistors in the above described figure(s) is/are shown asfield effect transistors (FETs), as one of ordinary skill in the artwill appreciate, the transistors may be implemented using any type oftransistor structure including, but not limited to, bipolar, metal oxidesemiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFET), N-well transistors,P-well transistors, enhancement mode, depletion mode, and zero voltagethreshold (VT) transistors.

Unless specifically stated to the contra, signals to, from, and/orbetween elements in a figure of any of the figures presented herein maybe analog or digital, continuous time or discrete time, and single-endedor differential. For instance, if a signal path is shown as asingle-ended path, it also represents a differential signal path.Similarly, if a signal path is shown as a differential path, it alsorepresents a single-ended signal path. While one or more particulararchitectures are described herein, other architectures can likewise beimplemented that use one or more data buses not expressly shown, directconnectivity between elements, and/or indirect coupling between otherelements as recognized by one of average skill in the art.

The term “module” is used in the description of one or more of theembodiments. A module implements one or more functions via a device suchas a processor or other processing device or other hardware that mayinclude or operate in association with a memory that stores operationalinstructions. A module may operate independently and/or in conjunctionwith software and/or firmware. As also used herein, a module may containone or more sub-modules, each of which may be one or more modules.

As may further be used herein, a computer readable memory includes oneor more memory elements. A memory element may be a separate memorydevice, multiple memory devices, or a set of memory locations within amemory device. Such a memory device may be a read-only memory, randomaccess memory, volatile memory, non-volatile memory, static memory,dynamic memory, flash memory, cache memory, and/or any device thatstores digital information. The memory device may be in a form asolid-state memory, a hard drive memory, cloud memory, thumb drive,server memory, computing device memory, and/or other physical medium forstoring digital information.

While particular combinations of various functions and features of theone or more embodiments have been expressly described herein, othercombinations of these features and functions are likewise possible. Thepresent disclosure is not limited by the particular examples disclosedherein and expressly incorporates these other combinations.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for execution by a computing device that includes a processor, the method comprises: receiving a resource to be stored in a dispersed storage network (DSN), the DSN comprising a DSN processing unit and plural DSN storage units, wherein the DSN processing unit is configured to store data objects in the DSN by: producing encoded data slices via disperse storage error encoding of data segments of the data objects, and transmitting the encoded data slices to ones of the plural DSN storage units for writing to memory; storing the resource in the DSN; automatically setting a protection status of the resource to a protected status at a time of the storing of the resource in the DSN, wherein the resource can be read in the DSN but cannot be modified or deleted in the DSN while the protection status is the protected status, wherein the protection status is configured to be maintained as the protected status until a protection period has elapsed, wherein the protection status is configured to be automatically changed from the protected status to an unprotected status based on determining that the protection period has elapsed, and wherein the protection status is stored at a different entity and is retrieved and/or altered via network communication; determining a set of actor parties required to authorize a change of the protection status of the resource from the protected status to the unprotected status; determining a quorum size for a number of the set of actor parties required to authorize a change of the protection status of the resource from the protected status to the unprotected status; receiving, from a plurality of requestors via a network, a plurality of authorizations to change the protection status of the resource from the protected status to the unprotected status; identifying a plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors, wherein each one of the plurality of subsets corresponds to one of the set of actor parties; and setting the protection status of the resource to the unprotected status in response to determining, for every one of the set of actor parties, that a number of requestors in a corresponding one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors is greater than or equal to the quorum size for the one of the set of actor parties.
 2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving, via the network, a request indicating a modification of the resource; and facilitating the modification of the resource in response to determining the protection status of the resource is set as the unprotected status.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the request is received from one of the plurality of requestors, and wherein the modification of the resource is facilitated in further response to determining that the one of the plurality of requestors corresponds to one of the set of actor parties.
 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising: maintaining the protection status of the resource as the protected status in response to determining, for one of the set of actor parties, that the number of requestors in the corresponding one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors is less than the quorum size for the one of the set of actor parties.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein identifying the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors includes extracting credential data from at least one of the plurality of authorizations, and wherein each one of the plurality of subsets includes only ones of the plurality of requestors with credential data extracted from corresponding ones of the plurality of authorizations indicating the ones of the plurality of requestors are validated as members of one of the set of actor parties corresponding to the one of the plurality of subsets.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein at least one of the plurality of requestors is included in none of the plurality of subsets in response to determining that the credential data for the at least one of the plurality of requestors indicates the at least one of the plurality of requestors is not validated as a member of any of the set of actor parties.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein a number of actor parties in the set of actor parties is greater than one, and wherein the quorum size for each the set of actor parties is greater than or equal to one.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein a first one of the set of actor parties corresponds to an owner party, wherein a second one of the set of actor parties corresponds to an operator party, wherein the owner party corresponds to a plurality of end users, wherein the operator party includes a single operator, wherein the quorum size for the operator party is equal to one, and wherein the protection status of the resource is set to the unprotected status in response to determining that the number of requestors in a first one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors corresponding to the owner party is greater than or equal to a quorum size for the owner party, and in further response to determining that the number of requestors in a second one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors corresponding to the operator party includes the single operator.
 9. The method of claim 8, further comprising determining the plurality of end users in the owner party based on identifying a plurality of end users corresponding to the resource.
 10. The method of claim 8, wherein the quorum size for the owner party is greater than one.
 11. The method of claim 7, wherein an additional actor party corresponds to an arbitrator party, further comprising: identifying an arbitrator subset of the plurality of requestors, wherein the arbitrator subset includes ones of the plurality of requestors corresponding to the arbitrator party; determining, for exactly one of the set of actor parties, that a number of requestors in a corresponding one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors is less than the quorum size for the one of the set of actor parties; and setting the protection status of the resource to the unprotected status in response to determining, for all remaining ones of the set of actor parties, that a number of requestors in a corresponding one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors is greater than or equal to the quorum size for the one of the set of actor parties, and in response to further determining that a number of requestors in the arbitrator subset is greater than or equal to a quorum size for the one of the set of actor parties.
 12. The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving quorum size selection data, wherein the quorum size selection data was generated by a client device corresponding to an administrator based on user input to a graphical user interface in response to a prompt presented by the graphical user interface, wherein the graphical user interface was displayed by a display device of the client device; wherein the quorum size is determined for each of the set of actor parties based on the quorum size selection data.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein a sum of quorum sizes for all of the set of actor parties is greater than one in response to the prompt presented by the graphical user interface requiring the quorum size selection data to adhere to a number of actor parties in the set of actor parties being greater than one, and the quorum size for each the set of actor parties being greater than or equal to one.
 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the quorum size for at least one of the set of actor parties is calculated as a function of a number of possible requestors included in the at least one of the set of actor parties, and wherein the number of possible requestors included in the at least one of the set of actor parties is greater than one.
 15. A processing system of a computing device comprises: at least one processor; a memory that stores operational instructions, that when executed by the at least one processor cause the processing system to: receive a resource to be stored in a dispersed storage network (DSN), the DSN comprising a DSN processing unit and plural DSN storage units, wherein the DSN processing unit is configured to store data objects in the DSN by: producing encoded data slices via disperse storage error encoding of data segments of the data objects, and transmitting the encoded data slices to ones of the plural DSN storage units for writing to memory; store the resource in the DSN; automatically set a protection status of the resource to a protected status at a time of the storing of the resource in the DSN, wherein the resource can be read in the DSN but cannot be modified or deleted in the DSN while the protection status is the protected status, wherein the protection status is configured to be maintained as the protected status until a protection period has elapsed, wherein the protection status is configured to be automatically changed from the protected status to an unprotected status based on determining that the protection period has elapsed, and wherein the protection status is stored at a different entity and is retrieved and/or altered via network communication; determine a set of actor parties required to authorize a change of the protection status of the resource from the protected status to the unprotected status before the protection period has elapsed; determine a quorum size for a number of the set of actor parties required to authorize a change of the protection status of the resource from the protected status to the unprotected status; receive, from a plurality of requestors via a network, a plurality of authorizations to change the protection status of the resource from the protected status to an unprotected status; identify a plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors, wherein each one of the plurality of subsets corresponds to one of the set of actor parties; and set the protection status of the resource to the unprotected status before the protection period has elapsed and in response to determining, for every one of the set of actor parties, that a number of requestors in a corresponding one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors is greater than or equal to the quorum size for the one of the set of actor parties.
 16. The processing system of claim 15, wherein the operational instructions, when executed by the at least one processor, further cause the processing system to: receive, via the network, a request indicating a modification of the resource; and facilitate the modification of the resource in response to determining the protection status of the resource is set as the unprotected status.
 17. The processing system of claim 15, wherein identifying the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors includes extracting credential data from at least one of the plurality of authorizations, and wherein each one of the plurality of subsets includes only ones of the plurality of requestors with credential data extracted from corresponding ones of the plurality of authorizations indicating the ones of the plurality of requestors are validated as members of one of the set of actor parties corresponding to the one of the plurality of subsets.
 18. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium comprises: at least one memory section that stores operational instructions that, when executed by a processing system that includes a processor and a memory, causes the processing system to: receive a resource to be stored in a dispersed storage network (DSN), the DSN comprising a DSN processing unit and plural DSN storage units, wherein the DSN processing unit is configured to store data objects in the DSN by: producing encoded data slices via disperse storage error encoding of data segments of the data objects, and transmitting the encoded data slices to ones of the plural DSN storage units for writing to memory; store the resource in the DSN; automatically set a protection status of the resource to a protected status at a time of the storing of the resource in the DSN, wherein the resource can be read in the DSN but cannot be modified or deleted in the DSN while the protection status is the protected status, wherein the protection status is stored at a different entity and is retrieved and/or altered via network communication; determine a set of actor parties required to authorize a change of the protection status of the resource from the protected status to an unprotected status; determine a quorum size for a number of the set of actor parties required to authorize a change of the protection status of the resource from the protected status to the unprotected status; receive, from a plurality of requestors via a network, a plurality of authorizations to change the protection status of the resource from the protected status to an unprotected status; identify a plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors, wherein each one of the plurality of subsets corresponds to one of the set of actor parties; and set the protection status of the resource to the unprotected status in response to determining, for every one of the set of actor parties, that a number of requestors in a corresponding one of the plurality of subsets of the plurality of requestors is greater than or equal to the quorum size for the one of the set of actor parties.
 19. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of the DSN storage units equals an information dispersal algorithm (IDA) width threshold number.
 20. The method of claim 19, wherein the computing device is the DSN processing unit. 